Running sequential code reviews with different LLMs has been proving its worth over the last couple of days since I implemented the feature. I am finding that follow-up reviews are correctly challenging the initial runs, and producing a better result overall.

Today I have been working on adding tool calling for agents so that they can grep, ls, and readfile outside the touched files.

One of the tradeoffs I am trying to balance is token usage. I am seeing reviews range from $0.03 - $0.25 depending on the size and model (using grok-4.3 and qwen-3.7-max via openrouter). I may need to introduce levers so that users can choose whether to do deeper reviews with full tool usage and post-change file contents, or more shallow reviews that are diff-only.

I'm also looking in to adding support for ACP agentclientprotocol.com so that subscriptions (Claude Code, Codex, etc) can be used. I already have MCP support, but ACP would allow the user to kick off a review from inside the app (MCP is the opposite direction)