Your ChatGPT copy is technically correct. It's also clearly AI.

Talked to a dozen SaaS founders this month about their landing pages. Most used AI for copy. Most shipped what they got. When I asked how they felt about it, almost everyone said the same thing: "it's fine."

Not "it converts." Not "people respond to it." Just fine.

What I kept hearing under that: the copy described the problem accurately but didn't sound like someone who'd actually been annoyed by it. It sounded researched. Your users can feel that.

The lines that make people trust you tend to have something a little off in them. A specific complaint. A detail only someone who'd actually been there would include. AI smooths all of that out because smooth is statistically safe.

Been building something for this. Curious: if your copy felt "fine" but wrong, what did wrong mean to you?